Will Same Sex Couples Listen to Their "Children?"
“He shall turn the hearts of fathers towards their children
and the hearts of children towards their fathers, lest I come and strike the
land with a curse.” (Prophecy of Malachi verse 24)
On Oct 6, 2013, the people of the state of Colorado woke up, rubbed
their eyes and found out same sex “marriage” was now a reality.
 |
| The US Supreme Court Gavel Will Come Down in June Same Sex "Marriage" will be decided |
Truly their surprise was justified, for the legal arrangement came in
through the Kitchen -- Kitchen v Herbert, that
is. The Tenth Circuit Court approved a lower court’s determination that Utah’s
ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court nodded
and winked: None of my business. And so Colorado and five other states in the jurisdiction
of the Tenth Circuit Court suddenly had legal same sex “marriage.”
When the same thing happened in Washington State, my elderly cousin Bob
grumbled to me. “Susan, I can now (legally) marry a man, smoke dope and kill
myself.” Thirty-seven states have legal same sex marriage, most through similar
judicial shenanigans. Only three states in the Union have approved same-sex “marriage” by
popular vote.
“We have won the argument over marriage. We have won 34 statewide
elections (in favor of) traditional marriage ... even in liberal states like
California.. Yet our votes are overturned by a combination of black-robed
elites, craven corporations who have turned on their customers, the mainstream
media, and cowardly GOP politicians,” wrote Austin Ruse, President of the
Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, in Crisis Magazine.
As in most states, the people of Colorado did not vote for same sex
“marriage.” Colorado forcefully banned it from our state constitution in 2006
by a double-digit margin in favor of Colorado Amendment 43.
Eighteen black robes forming a meathead court imposed the institution on
us while deciding a case for nearby Utah.
I live in Colorado. My rights have been trampled upon.
“Utah's prohibition on same-sex marriage
conflicts with the United States Constitution's guarantees of equal protection
and due process under the law. The State's current laws deny its gay and
lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the
dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason. Accordingly, the
court finds that these laws are unconstitutional,” so droned the imbecile court.
In fact, the court said prohibition of same-sex marriage
failed a “rational basis review.” Rational? If it was rational, why didn’t our founding fathers
mention it? Ironically, the Tenth Circuit Court failed my mother’s “rational basis review.” If she were still alive today she
would say, “Susan, those people don’t have the sense that God gave a goose!”
 |
Virginia Marriage Supporters outside the U.S. 4th Circuit Court wait in vain. Traditional Marriage was overturned July 28, 2014 |
Mankind has lost his bodily and spiritual identity. God
made us a community of persons – male and female. “In the day when God created man, He made him
in the likeness of God. He created them male and female, and He blessed them
and named them Man in the day when they were created.” (Gen 5:1-2) But we are busy -- busy
throwing out the other half of our human identity. We wish to live in
isolation, not as a man, but as a segregated half of humanity -- either male or
female. And the ultimate goal of the genderless identity movement is nothing
short of the end of the human race.
“I grew up in an atmosphere where adult sexuality was a
measure of people’s worthiness,” said Rivka Edelman in a Supreme Court filing
on same sex marriage. Referring to her mother and her three same sex partners,
she said, “Their sex and identity meant everything. To them heterosexuals meant
nothing – breeding, low-level amoebas splitting in their conservative bedroom
communities. Our house was overrun with newly minted lesbians planning their
divorces and alimony strategies.”
Now on April 28, the U.S. Supreme Court will hold hearings
to decide same sex marriage for four other states, Kentucky Michigan, Ohio and
Tennessee. This very likely will be the case where same sex marriage is
nationalized.
The two women asking for legal marriage in this case have
become the poster-child for gay “parenting.”
April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse are raising four special
needs kids between the two of them and would like the same legal rights as any
parent. God bless them.
 |
| Jayne Rowse and April DeBoer |
Now come six adults raised by people who self identify as
homosexual to say that same sex “marriage” is an injustice to the children of
such a phony union. They are the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, long
associated with the demise of empires that became corrupt.
They are injecting real rationality into the discussion. Same
sex ”marriage” is supposed to rectify an alleged injustice against homosexuals,
but in fact creates a new injustice. Marriage comes with the right to have
children. People of the same sex cannot of themselves create children. They are
not structurally designed to do so. They must raise your children or use surrogates to make them. Both acts are unjust.
In fact, the six argue that same sex marriage legalizes trafficking in women
and children.
 |
| Pope Francis |
The pope refers to the upbringing of self-identified
“strange man” Robert Oscar Lopez and Rivka Edelman, raised by a “Jewish lesbian
mother and her partners,” who are leading the charge to defend children before
the US Supreme Court on April 28. Lopez calls himself a “strange man” because his
mother and her same sex partner raised him. Married now to a woman, he once
only knew how to act like a woman and prostituted himself to men. He healed
himself as an adult by pursuing a relationship with his long estranged father. Lopez
and Edelman call themselves COGs, Children of Gays. I call them children raised
by unchaste adults. |
| God's Advocate for Traditional Marriage, Robert Oscar Lopez, who self identifies as bi-sexual because of his confused upbringing by same sex female couple |
The two have just produced Jephthah’s Daughters:
Innocent Casualties in the War for Family Equality. It’s an aptly named book. Few probably remember Jephthah,
whose story appears in the book of Judges. Eager to overcome the stigma of the
bastard son, he rashly vowed to God he would sacrifice whoever greeted him at
the front door of his home if only he could win victory over the Ammonites. He
won, but when he returned home, the one who loved him best -- his only child, a
daughter – greeted him before any others. And with great sorrow, Jephthah killed
her.
“Until now courts presumed that whatever gay couples
wanted automatically would benefit the children placed in gay couples’ homes.
No serious discussion has occurred in the courts with the focus on points where
children and their gay guardians have divergent or even conflicting interests,”
Lopez argues in his brief before the Supreme Court.
He argues that until now the courts have only heard from children
who were still under the thumb of their same sex parents. And unfortunately
children growing up in those segregated same-sex environments fear accusations
of “homophobic.”
What is clear from Jephthah’s Daughters, which
covers over 70 cases of same sex parenting, is that children’s feelings in
these situations are repressed because of their adult care giver’s sensitivity
to any mention of the opposite sex parent. “One COG, a boy conceived in the
1990s by a surrogate contract with a gay father, was taken to a lesbian
psychiatrist who told him that his aching sadness on Mother’s Day was the
result of homophobia. He was told to apologize to his gay father for having
confided in the lesbian psychiatrist about his anger over not having a mother,”
Lopez said.
“Gay marriage will allow adults to acquire custody of
other people’s children and deny those children connections to their original
father and mother,” Lopez added. He is particularly sensitive to people’s
ethnic origins because he is the “son of a Puerto Rican lesbian and a Filipino
man.” And Rivka Edelman is Jewish. “Gay marriage targets children of gay parents for discrimination,” Lopez concluded.
“Children learn to role play the part of living dolls,”
said Rivka Edelman, who used her real name, B.N. Klein, in the court filing, “Our
parents used us as little display objects. We existed only to make our parents
look good, to feed the insatiable egos that were our parents. Does that sound
like a happy childhood?”
“A child is neither a constitutional right nor the natural
consequence of same-sex sexual relations, and a marriage license does not
change biological reality. The impact of
forcing children to attribute their filial affections to non-parents is
damaging to all involved, but women as a class bear the hardest burden,”
Edelman continued.
“When gay men want children on demand, such a system
requires women to either hyper-ovulate and sell their own genetic material or
to carry children and then dissolve the natural bond between them and their
offspring,” she told the court.
“Surrogate mothers’ other children must witness their
mother being used as an incubator and their sibling being sent away and sold.
When lesbians want children on demand, there is a loss imposed on the child and
the excluded father.”
“Gay marriage imposes unequal burdens on women and denies
women equal protection under the law,” Edelman said, adding that superovulation
drugs used to get a woman’s egg have been linked to death and cancer.
“Industrialized procreation is harmful to women. This is a multi-million dollar
industry gearing up to create a sub-caste of breeder women.”
Though she claims to have zero interest in any religion,
Edelman came to the same conclusion as the Catholic Church: “Children are not a
right.” And I would add: “They are a gift to marriage.”
What is interesting about this whole mess is that while
trying to protect so-called rights of same-sex couples, the courts go on
creating injustices. Not just the surrogate mothers whose wombs are rented to
homosexual couples, not just the
children raised by same sex strangers, but
also the institution of marriage itself and religious freedom are threatened, Jephthah
Daughters reveals.
 |
| On the issue of Same Sex "Marriage" the scales are tipped unjustly |
Statisticians and sociologists studying the effect of
legalized same sex marriage in Spain concluded it cheapened marriage. There was
a real decline in marriages after it was instituted. And in one year there was a 75 percent increase in divorces due to the
law. But the group most affected were people who were married less than a year
– their divorce rate went up 330 percent! The researchers attributed it to
creating options – same sex marriage and easier divorce -- which “trivialized
marriage.”
In Canada, the religious persecution from instituting same
sex marriage was felt immediately. Civil marriage commissioners who refused to
preside over such arrangements lost their jobs, and the Roman Catholic Knights
of Columbus were fined for refusing to rent their facilities for post same-sex
“wedding” celebrations.
Speech is no longer free in Canada. “Many of those who have
persisted in voicing their dissent have been subjected to investigations by
human rights commissions and proceedings before human right tribunals,” said
Professor Bradley W. Miller in his paper, “Same-Sex Marriage Ten Years on:
Lessons from Canada.” He added that those who are poor or poorly educated and
without institutional affiliation have suffered the most. They have been forced
to pay fines, make apologies and undertake never to speak on such matters
again. Miller’s paper was quoted in Jephthah’s Daughers.
In the United States, persecution has already begun. And
the little people have been the hardest hit. Wedding florists, photographers and Christian
bakeries have been fined and forced out of business. This is an amazing amount of injustice coming
out of an institution that is supposed to rectify an injustice!
But there’s a reason for that. My husband, Lawrence Fox,
knows the answer: “Any time you do not use something for its natural purpose,
you create injustice.”
So according to Natural Law, each thing has its own natural
purpose. Go get yourself a delicious dessert – how about a brownie? Hold the
brownie to your eye. Can you taste it with your eye?
Ouch! The brownie hurts in my eye. That’s an injustice! Eyes can’t taste things. The purpose of the
eye is to see. Look at the brownie. Can you see it? Yes, I can.
So now pop the brownie in your mouth. Yum. Guess the
purpose of the mouth. No injustice there.
Now let’s look at marriage. What is the purpose of marriage?
I know some young Muslim guys on Twitter told me its purpose was pleasure. It’s
true that’s part of sexual relations. But if that’s the only purpose of sex,
then injustices crop up like prostitution and rape. Those are injustices
created when the sexual act is not used according to its proper natural
purpose.
In marriage, however, two people are able to form a very strong personal bond to last a lifetime. Children are a natural consequence of
this kind of pairing. And a strong bond between two structurally complementary adults
allows the children to grow up in a secure and loving environment in which they
know their own identity. They know who is their mother, and who is their father.
No injustices result from this pairing unless the parents get
a divorce. This “irresponsible separation,” as Pope Francis told us, causes children to “suffer
the outcome of a culture of exaggerated individual rights.” As in the case of same sex “marriage,” the children’s needs are
put aside to satisfy the selfish desires of adults. (I understand some divorces are necessary to
protect the wife or child from abuse.)
It’s true that homosexual unions do form bonds on a
natural level because of the bonding hormone Oxytocin, which is released in the
sexual act. But two people of the same sex who care about one another are
friends. Introducing sexual activity into the friendship creates an injustice –
just like sticking a brownie in your eye. “Those who share a vested interest in
vice falsely claim the fair name of friendship, because one who fails to love
is not a friend,” according to Aelred of Rievaulx, who wrote “Spiritual
Friendship” in the 12th century.
“But when so much sweetness is experienced in such empty
friendship, which lust pollutes, avarice corrupts, or wantonness defiles, just
imagine the sweetness to be experienced in this other friendship: the more
righteous, chaste, and open it is, the more it is carefree, enjoyable and
happy,” he wrote, taking aim at same sex liaisons. I can’t tell you how many modern
accounts I’ve read of young men who left the homosexual lifestyle and reunited
with one of their lovers as a chaste friend. They said they were much happier
in the relationship when sex was not involved.
And that’s why we call “sin” missing the mark. A same sex
couple aims to love each other, but they miss the mark by introducing sexual
activity into the relationship. And the children caught in these homosexual
households suffer enormously. Mainly, a same sex union creates a highly sexualized environment, and children's innocence is violated. Now the "children" have grown up and made their voices
heard. I wonder if the people who advocate for same sex “marriage” will listen?
 |
| Little girl at Toronto Pride Parade heartbreakingly shocked by undressed men in the parade. Children of Same-Sex unions report being taken to nude gay beaches, cleaning feces off their fathers' sheets, having their mothers inordinately interested in their own sexuality at a very young age. I removed the portion of the picture with the nude male by request. You can see the whole picture here. |
“My home life was not traditional nor conventional. I
suffered because of it, in ways that are difficult for sociologists to index.
Both nervous and yet blunt, I would later seem strange even in the eyes of gay
and bisexual adults who had little patience for someone like me. I was just as
odd to them as I was to straight people,” Lopez opined in a recent article in
Life Site News.
 |
| Robert Lopez |
“Life is hard when you are strange.
Even now, I have very few friends and often feel as though I do not understand
people because of the unspoken gender cues that everyone around me, even gays
raised in traditional homes, takes for granted. Though I am hard working and a
quick learner, I have trouble in professional settings because co-workers find
me bizarre.” Lopez and the other children raised by same sex partners say that
the damage done to them, as children, will haunt them to the end of their
lives.
I highly recommend reading Jephthah’s Daughters. You
will never again just shrug your shoulders and say, “Well what they do in their
same sex relationship is none of my business.”
Since this was written, the U.S. Supreme Court legalized Same Sex "Marriage" for the whole country on June 26, 2015 (Black Friday) Read SAME SEX "MARRIAGE:" Another Chapter in Grimm's Fairy Tales
Did you enjoy this article? Perhaps you would also enjoy A Child's Right to Mom and Dad: Why Kids of Gays Oppose Gay Adoption.
Don't Miss the Sequel to this piece: "Gay Parenting:" Children Raised by Unchaste Adults Lead Difficult Lives
Did you enjoy this article? Perhaps you would also enjoy A Child's Right to Mom and Dad: Why Kids of Gays Oppose Gay Adoption.
