Welcome Friends!

A Catholic blog about faith, social issues, economics, culture, politics and poetry -- powered by Daily Mass & Rosary

If you like us, share us! Social media buttons are available at the end of each post.

Monday, June 15, 2015

Wrong Way to Paradise: The Bible Watchtower Society

Reformers of the Reformation: Jehovah's Witnesses

by Lawrence Fox


Author Lawrence Fox's copy of "The Way to Paradise" 
Somewhere during my life’s journey I received a thin and delicate book titled, “The Way to Paradise,” by W.E. Van Amburgh with an introduction written by John F. Rutherford, who is one of two key founders of the Bible Watchtower Society, also known as Jehovah's Witnesses.
 
The JW movement, first founded by Charles T. Russell (1852 – 1916) and Rutherford (1869 – 1942), remains in my honest estimation an assent of intellect and will to imagination under the guise of religion with no attempt of understanding the past.

It inherited this abhorrence of the past from the reformers who created Church history as a triptych: First came apostles, then (Roman Catholic) apostasy, and finally the Reformation later reformed by reformers and again reformed by even later reformers until you arrive at the Mythical Watchtower Movement. 
The unchanging truth handed down to the apostles from Jesus Christ, known as the Deposit of Faith, has been jealously guarded by the Roman Catholic Church for over 2,000 years, but the reformers chipped away a little truth here and there until the Watchtower Society emerged as a totally non-Christian church that pretended to be Christian -- sort of. Even their Bible -- the New World Translation -- is different than all other Christian Bibles. As a result, the movement is a cradle for newly minted atheists -- so badly abused by what they think is a Christian movement that they are unable to find another Church. A branch of my wife's family joined JWs decades ago, and she has noticed her cousins stripping all religion from their lives upon leaving the organization. 

"The Way to Paradise" was copyrighted in 1924 and published by the International Bible Students Association, Brooklyn, New York in 1925. The purpose of the book was to narrate for bustling members of the Watchtower Society, “A brief history of the 7,000 years of sin from the time when sin was unknown to the time when again there will be no sin along with Scriptural biographies of Michael who became the Christ and of Lucifer who became the Devil.” What follows is a brief summary of the doctrines, themes, and notions describe in the delicate book along with a few personal observations. It is not my intention to answer every belief of the Jehovah's Witnesses in this piece. 

Way to Paradise in Summary

Jehovah's Witnesses taught that God is a monistic (solitary) being who dwells in a specific place where flesh and blood cannot enter. This is one of the arguments made in the book against the Christian Doctrine of Jesus’ Resurrection from the Dead and Ascension into Heaven. Jesus’ physical Resurrection is also rejected by Atheists, Modernists, Materialists and Muslims.

Contrast the tender image of St. Thomas, the doubter, touching the wounds of Jesus in the upper room after the bodily Resurrection of
The Apostle Thomas touching the wounds
of Christ after His Bodily Resurrection
the Incarnate Christ. Witnessed by John and the other apostles, they heard him passionately say to Jesus,  
"My Lord and my God!"  

But the Modernists deny the Resurrection since the spiritual (non-material realm) does not exist. Modernists identify the gospels as being expressions of faith, but not history. In other words, the Jesus of Faith is not the Jesus of History. Muslims deny Jesus’ Resurrection since they don't believe that Jesus actually died on the Cross. Islam borrows this notion from Gnostic sources: Jesus did not take flesh and therefore could not be put to death.

Jehovah's  Witness deny Jesus’s Resurrection due to an imagination which dictates that God is a solitary being who lives in a place that flesh and blood cannot inhabit; therefore Jesus Christ Incarnate cannot enter heaven with a Resurrected Body. 

So what's wrong with that?  God is not locked in a place that flesh and blood cannot enter. He is transcendent, outside time and place. God's inner life is not solitary like man's. He is one divine nature in a Communion of Three 
Persons. This is demonstrated by God saying, "It is not good for man to be alone." A solitary God could not dream of a communion of persons existing within humanity as a good. 

According to the Watchtower, Michael the Archangel was Jehovah’s first creation and all things were created with the assistance of this  creature also identified as God’s Word. This Michael was not divine and immortal until he first proved his worthiness to receive such honors. 

He agreed to a plan given by Jehovah to serve as a man. The example the author gives for this change is as follows:  “Suppose a farmer owned a sheep that had been bad and was condemned to die. Suppose the owner of the sheep also had a fine shepherd 
dog. And after explaining (to the dog) that the disobedient sheep 
Christ is not -- according to the Watchtower Society  --
the Good Shepherd. He is a just a sheep.  
must die unless some other sheep die in its place, (he) would make this proposition to him (the dog): 'Trust if you will agree to let me transform you from a dog into a sheep, and then consent to die in the place of that sheep. I will then transform you into a man like myself.'" 


The dog ceases to exist and is made into a sheep. As a sheep, it dies and no longer exists. Then it wakes up recreated as a human without an abiding spirit or soul. The farmer knew the dog when it was a dog, as a sheep when it was a sheep, and now knows the sheep as a human like himself. This is not Christian incarnation, it's not even Hindu re-incarnation since with each transitional state nothing of the previous state existed except the farmer's memory of each transitional state. The analogy given by the author is completely rooted in his imagination. It is not rooted in Divine Revelation (oral and written) nor is it rooted in reason. 

The Watchtower Society professes that
Jesus once was St. Michael,
according to the Watchtower
Society 
Michael was once a created angel and then re-created into the human Jesus of Nazareth, who died and was then was re-created into a divine spirit. Jehovah Witnesses hold that human’s do not possess a living soul. The Watchtower clings to the idea that the understanding of the human soul is the work of Satan. Modernists, Atheists, Sadducees, and Jehovah Witnesses share a common notion: that the human person is a machine and not a hylomorphic being consisting of body and soul. Jehovah Witnesses somehow attribute Neo-Platonism - which taught that souls exist prior to the body - as formal Christian doctrine. The Watchtower demonstrates time and again a willful ignorance of Church History and Sacred Scripture.

They argue that humans have a physical mind capable of imagining spiritual thoughts, concepts, and abstractions without owning a soul or spirit. In this sense, they share the same faith as an atheist and materialist. Strange bedfellows. 

In other words, the material mind of man is capable of deluding itself into thinking that it possesses something spiritual. Jesus the man was capable of knowing the thoughts of men. It seems that the Witnesses believe that Jesus was interpreting human
electromagnetic waves, much like a lie detector measures physical responses to questions. Or possibly Jehovah interpreted men’s electro-magnetic waves and transmitted their meaning back to Jesus by
The Materialist's view of how Jesus reads
others' thoughts using electro-magnetic waves!
another set of electro-magnetic waves. Atheists -- locked in the same material world -- have defined soul, spirit and moral goodness as “The God Delusion” or “The Selfish Gene.” 

Jehovah's Witnesses also believe the human does not possess a spirit or soul and therefore what goes back to Jehovah upon death is simply Jehovah’s memory of that person. In other words, what Adam (the first man) received from Jehovah was life giving air and “that mechanism” (my words) which recorded everything Adam would do or say. Jesus the new Adam received from Jehovah this life giving air and “mechanism” capable of recording everything Jesus did and said.

Jesus of Nazareth was a man without a soul, who performed miracles by the will of Jehovah. Jesus was put to death and utterly died on the cross. Jehovah’s recorded memory of Jesus is what was committed back into the hands of Jehovah at the cross. Note that without a soul, there is no self-awareness in God's creatures.


According to the Witnesses, Jesus’ body was taken from the tomb by Jehovah and hidden so that Christians would not worship his body. This is the same reason Witnesses argue Jehovah took and hid Moses’ body, which was never found by the people of Israel. It is unclear -- in the Witness theology -- what Jesus and his Apostles saw when they saw and heard Moses and Elijah on the Mountain of Transfiguration. One can only assume that both Moses and Elijah were spirit creatures at that point in time. Jesus’ Transfiguration is a mystery in the Jehovah Witness theology since Jesus was a man without spirit or soul and bodies generally do not become brilliant on their own. I speak sarcastically.


Heaven is a place in the Witnesses's theology where a  flesh and blood resurrected body could not enter. Therefore, after his death, Michael/Jesus was  re-created as a divine spirit.   In other words, what Jehovah's Witnesses do not understand is that Jesus had a glorified  body after His Resurrection, therefore He was able to enter into heaven. 

In the "
Way to Paradise," Jesus death on the cross was only meant to substitute Adam’s human nature as a means of avoiding punishment. Jesus’s death really had nothing to do with justification and sanctification (nor could it). Men cannot save men; only God can save men and since Jesus was not God Incarnate, nothing was really reconciled, justified or sanctified by Jesus through the Cross. In a material sense, amnesty was awarded to Adam’s sinful humanity by the actions of another man. So in a strange manner, Jesus provided an excuse for Adam's sin.

Divine Revelation demonstrates, however, that as a result of the very real Incarnation of Jesus Christ, humanity now participates in God's divine nature. Men and women are now adopted sons and daughters of God in Christ Jesus. This is because Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever. (Hebrews 13:8) No detours, no Michael, no sheep nor dogs.

"Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not appeared as yet what we will be. We know that when He appears, we will be like Him, because we will see Him just as He is." (1John 3:2) This means that we cannot see God face to face until we have received the Spirit of Christ. 

The "Wrong" Way to Paradise teaches that familiar anit-Catholic diatribe that after the death of Jesus, the true followers of the bible were persecuted by the Catholic Church and the world entered into Dark Ages. Yes, the Bible, which was formed and canonized by the Catholic Church, was hidden and burned by the same Catholic Church. It is again an abysmal reading of Church History. These Dark Ages remained in place, the JWs say,  until the 19th century when bibles (by the Watchtower Society) were made available to peoples everywhere. The author noted that in 1924 a great Spiritual Enlightenment is growing in the world as a result of so many bibles being printed and distributed. A bible here and a bible there all translated and read and interpreted by everyone to mean just about anything one wants paradoxically devolves into a spiritual deadening, not an awakening. 

According to the author, Van Amburgh, Satan managed to convince Emperor Constantine of Rome to form a council of Bishops in 325 AD for the purpose of identifying Jesus as God, the Holy Spirit as God and the Father as God; all three Persons as "one Person," the Witnesses explain. Constantine apparently did this so that Christians would become heathens and fight for the Roman Empire. I am not sure what the abysmal interpretation of the Council has to do with Christians becoming  soldiers. Anyway, it is argued in the most sophomoric sense by JWs, that 1 + 1+ 1 = 3, and 3 is not equal to 1 and that the son cannot be as old as the father. And therefore, Constantine created the doctrine of the Trinity so that the empire would have more soldiers.

This has to be the most ignorant reading of Church History and Church Doctrine ever devised. In reality, Christians were put to death because they confessed Jesus to be "Lord and God" long before Constantine's Council. Yet the Watchtower Society believes that all Christians were Arians -- precursors to  Jehovah's Witnesses -- from the beginning.  So much for history.  


I guess the plethora of epitaphs, homilies, sermons, apologetics, epistles, and tessera sent between dioceses which identified the various martyrs as Catholic Christians is simply fiction. So sad.

Now, according to the Watchtower,  the various epochs of the world can be interpreted from various tunnels and caverns located in the Pyramids. 


Watchtower Pyramid Memorial at Gravesite of JW Founder Charles Russell 
God’s plan for humanity was written in stone in the Pyramids. It is possible that Shem, the son of Noah, a faithful servant of Jehovah, was in charge of the construction of the Pyramids and detailed within them the deepest secrets of geometrical, geographical, astronomical and mathematical science. The tunnels supposedly tell the dates of the Exodus from Egypt, the date of the birth and death of Jesus and the date of the French Revolution and the great World War I. But this is pure pagan imagination. 

According to the Watchtower, Christ returned invisibly in 1914. He had to come invisibly because it was foretold in the Bible in Stone (the Pyramids) that he would come, and then he failed to show up. 


Yes, the bible and Bible in Stone  tell us that 1914 AD is the beginning of Jehovah’s Invisible Kingdom on Earth. Yes, the Bible and Bible in Stone together confirm that by 1925-1926 there will be a great ouster of Satan’s Kingdoms from the Earth, ushering in a new era. The tragedy is this is a literal written prophesy within the Watchtower Society. But instead of what they expected, what emerged were the atheist materialist movements of Nazism, Communism, Liberalism and Socialism. It seemed like the Bible in Stone predicted the return of Satan, not Jesus.

According to the Watchtower, there are two separate contracts with mankind. In one, some  humans will live in heaven as spirit creatures. And in the other, the remainder of men will live as a perfect Adam on earth. Those living in heaven will number about 144,000. 


Humanity will one day live on earth under the protection of Jesus (the spirit creature). In this state, man will learn not to lie, not to steal, not to murder, and begin to live longer because they will be living purer lives. Mankind will eventually be restored to Adam’s original human perfection before the fall. Though how this will happen is a mystery as it's a materialistic religion, and people do not experience conversion of their hearts. 

All those who died in previous ages will then be resurrected. They will be surprised, of course, to see airplanes, cars, telephones,  lights and they will wonder what has transpired, “One moment we were sick and dying and the next moment we see such wonderful technology.” Since they do not have souls they have no memory of death or being placed in the grave. The Way to Paradise then states, “We who are alive prior to their resurrection must prepare our homes and places to  welcome all our loved ones who will come back to life.”

Just like Atheism, Islam, and Mormonism, in the Watchtower Paradise, humans were not created to know, love, serve and be happy with God forever in Heaven. In other words, God is not the final end of His creatures. Like the 72 virgins in Islam, JWs look forward to a carnal blessedness. 


That is because Jehovah is locked in a specific place and is not omnipresent, nor transcendent and man does not possess an eternal soul, nor any self-awareness (except in a mechanical sense). And everything in the Bible is not really clear unless first interpreted by the Watchtower Society.

This ends the "Wrong" Way to Paradise.



Did you enjoy this piece. Lawrence Fox has written more. You might like Genderless "Marriage" Threatens the Foundation of Civilization 

Monday, June 8, 2015

Corpus Christi: Reconciliation between Man and God

Sermon by Rev. John Paul Shea
Corpus Christi, June 7, 2015
Saints Peter and Paul Parish, Tucson, AZ
Today, we celebrate the greatest gift ever
given to the world. This gift that our Catholic Church celebrates is the tradition and belief in the Real Presence of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist. 

The feast of Corpus Christi was instituted by Pope Urban IV in the year 1264, but in reality it is a feast that the Church has been celebrating ever since the Last Supper -- the moment Our Lord turned  bread and wine into His Body and Blood.

This occurred on Holy Thursday,  the day before He was sacrificed. Since this first institution of the Eucharist, the Church has firmly believed and taught that the bread and wine used in the sacrifice of the Mass become the Body and Blood of Christ while still under the appearance of bread and wine. 

My brothers and sisters, as we celebrate today’s solemnity of the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, let us reflect on the sacredness of what it is we are receiving when we come to our Lord in the Holy Eucharist. 

Today’s readings (Mark 14:12-16, 22-26) remind us that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sacrifice. Ever since the 1960s, we don’t often hear that term “sacrifice” when it comes to the Mass. But this is what the Mass is. It is a sacrifice. This understanding of the Mass as  sacrifice goes back to the time of ancient Israel when Biblical Jews would go into the temple to offer sacrifices to God.

The Jews would take a small part of God’s creation such as lambs or bulls and offer it to God as a sign of thanksgiving, communion, and reparation for sins. This act by the Jews was given to them by God in order to separate themselves from the rest of the nations who worshipped other gods, including cattle.  

We hear a description of this ancient sacrifice in today’s first reading (Exodus 24: 3-8) where Moses erects an altar and offers holocausts and sacrifices young bulls to the Lord. Moses takes blood and splashes it on the people and on the altar. This sprinkling of the blood, half on the altar and half on the people, signified the union between divinity and humanity. So the whole purpose of the sacrifice was to become one with God. 

As we look at today’s second reading (Hebrews 9:11-15), we can see that all of the Israelite sacrifices find its fulfillment in Jesus and His great sacrifice on the cross. In today’s second reading we hear,
“For if the blood of goats and bulls and the sprinkling of a heifer's ashes can sanctify those who are defiled so that their flesh is cleansed, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from dead works to worship the living God.” 

Fr. John Paul Shea 
My brothers and sisters, Our Lord Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the primitive sacrificial promise of the Old Testament. Jesus offers His Body in place of the old sacrifices of lambs or bulls. He is now the victim whose Blood seals all sacrifice.

Jesus Himself is the offering made to God to express thanksgiving, communion, and atonement! He gives His blood not to be sprinkled on the people and the altar as in the sacrifices of the Old Testament. His blood is given to us to ingest into our very bodies. Our Lord is the sacrifice who reconciles between divinity and humanity!

When we receive Our Lord in the Holy
And I, when I am lifted up
from the earth, I will draw all men
 to myself."(John 12:32)
Eucharist, we share in His sacrifice. As Jesus offered Himself to us as a sacrificial offering. He calls us who receive Him in His Sacred Body and Blood to offer ourselves to Him as a sacrifice by surrendering our lives to Him. 

We must be willing to lay aside our own desires and follow the teachings our Lord has handed down to us… We must be willing to sacrifice our own will and desires and pick up our cross and follow Our Lord. 

Parents sacrifice for their children… Husbands and wives sacrifice for one another… Children sacrifice themselves in love for their parents through obedience.

Many today in our culture do not want to
sacrifice… We want to live for ourselves. Our culture teaches us to indulge. Our society tells us to do whatever we want even if it is against the laws of God. But as Catholics we are called not to live for the waywardness of our culture. We are called to live for God.


As Catholics, we are to celebrate the sacrament of the Eucharist with much sacredness and much reverence. The celebration of the Eucharist is most sacred because the Eucharist is a true sacrifice. This is why the Church is and should be concerned that persons seek to receive Our Lord worthily.

When we eat our Lord’s Body and Blood worthily, the Eucharist makes us sacred. We
become what we eat. We become holy because Our Sacred Lord lives inside of us.
This is why we do not want to come to receive Our Lord if we are conscious of grave sin. This is why Our Lord has given us the sacrament of confession. It is an act of pride and arrogance when we receive Our Lord knowing that we are living a lifestyle that contradicts the teachings of Our Lord’s Church. 

My brothers and sisters, the gift of the Eucharist is the greatest gift ever! In the Eucharist we receive the True Presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Let us never ever take this sacred gift for granted!


Thursday, June 4, 2015

Liberalism: A Stupid & Cruel Fantasy

By Christopher Ziegler

Author Christopher Ziegler
can be found @CZWriting on
Twitter
In 1992, the US Supreme Court expanded abortion rights in America in a case called Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 

At issue was a Pennsylvania law that required a married woman to notify her husband if she was planning on having an abortion. The court overturned the law, writing that, “It cannot be claimed that the father’s interest in the fetus’ welfare is equal to the mother’s protected liberty.”

This decision is but one in a series of decisions stretching from the 1960s to the present day that have dismantled the Constitution and replaced it with the philosophy of liberalism. However, Casey is worth revisiting because of one particular sentence contained in its decision.

Speaking for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy (America’s favorite Catholic apostate) wrote the following:

At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of
Anti-Solomon, the most powerful man
in the United States Justice Anthony Kennedy,
 the one swing vote on the Supreme Court
meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life
.”

Is this not the clearest and most succinct definition of liberalism ever given by a public official? 

Of course, Kennedy was freelancing when he wrote the words, “At the heart of liberty.” He was not defining liberty but redefining it according to the new anti-Constitutional (liberal) interpretation. 

The true meaning of liberty is self-rule and self-mastery—the inner-strength to choose to uphold that which is right. There is an objective truth, which exists independently of us. The duty of each individual is to discern this truth and conform to it through knowledge, self-disciple and virtue. 

Such was the understanding held by all the great sages: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Old and New Testaments, Augustine,
16th president of the United States
Abraham Lincoln. He led us through
 the Civil War, preserved the Union,
abolished slavery
and  modernized the economy. 
Aquinas, Confucius, the U.S. founding fathers and Lincoln. It was the view shared by most of our countrymen and the courts until relatively recently. 

But that view is so passé.

Hence, we needed our Supreme Court to give us a looser interpretation of the law of the land. It is summarized by these words: “Liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence.” Voila! In the eyes of the law, the person who lives his life in rebellion against reality is now considered morally equivalent to the person who strives to conform to reality.

One area where we clearly see the effects of this liberal philosophy is in the big push currently going on for transsexual “rights.” The sex of a person is based on a biological reality determined by their genes—these are the facts. But the facts don’t matter according to liberalism because “liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence.” You get to decide your gender. Ignore those lame chromosomes. 

Or take the example of abortion. Life begins at conception. The life of the child in utero is nascent and precarious but it is a life nonetheless. However, as Melissa Harris-Perry of the archliberal network MSNBC said,“When does life begin? I submit the answer depends an awful lot on the feeling of the parents. A powerful feeling—but not science.” Life begins when we feel like it begins, because “liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence,” or, in this case, someone else’s existence. 

Or take the example of this country’s current approach to Islamic terrorism. The leaders of the Islamic State eat, sleep and breathe the Quran. They talk endlessly about Islam, sharia and the caliphate. But liberals understand what these Muslims believe better than the Muslims themselves. They know the terrorists must be misinterpreting the Quran because Islam is a “religion of peace.” Liberals can say that without having any understanding of Islamic history because “liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence.”

And then there’s Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court’s up-coming decision on gay “marriage.” It’s an undeniable fact that gay couples cannot produce children. Everyone should know that sex used outside of the way we were structurally created (such as sodomy — in either a same-sex relationship or an opposite-sex relationship) spreads disease. And, of course, the notion that the
Newly married same sex couple and adopted daughter
 (AP Photo)
Constitution contains a “right” to same-sex marriage is flagrantly absurd. But none of that matters because “liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence.” And if you believe otherwise you are a bigot who deserves to be ridiculed into silence.

As you can see, this philosophy can be used to justify literally anything. Liberalism is the negation of the reality that there is such a thing as objective truth. Liberals have no respect for tradition, natural law, religion, or whatever else is not expedient and useful for obtaining what they desire. This leaves them with no basis for morality beyond the will of the majority—the belief that might makes right. It is the triumph of the will, the essence of Nazism.

People accept the lie of liberalism because they are enslaved by their lusts and pride. America has fallen under a spell induced by decades of television and advertising, which have been constantly exhorting us to seek pleasure and enjoyment. Many have surrendered their power of self-control and have begun to worship their desires as idols. As a result, that which hinders their desires (reality) has to be minimized and explained away as something oppressive and useless. 

We are at a turning point in this country where the tone of liberalism is becoming increasingly shrill and self-righteous. Anger is the inevitable outcome of trying to fight against reality. As reality continues on in defiance of the liberal’s desire, his anger at what he deems “oppressive” turns into hatred and eventually rage. 

The rage is directed at the group of people, who are supposedly responsible for the "oppression," such as Christians, pro-lifers or people against same sex marriage, but really their hatred is just directed against reality. Under enough pressure, this rage can erupt into a spell of totalitarian violence—a reign of terror. From the guillotine to the gas chambers to the gulag, the history of liberalism is one of malice, resentment and bloodshed. 


The arrogance and empty promises of the Obama administration is what has brought the country to this sudden boiling point. Whether sanity is restored or whether the blood-dimmed tide is loosed depends on the prayers of the faithful men and women who remain. 

Into the Woods: Mr. Ziegler 

This post was first published at Barbwire.com