tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066465714745281883.post4912337748867441919..comments2023-10-10T09:10:43.247-05:00Comments on Christ's Faithful Witness: My Apostolate to the Immodestly Dressed WomanLawrence and Susan Foxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11526624376697144718noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066465714745281883.post-24571632782554592482013-12-09T12:37:30.597-06:002013-12-09T12:37:30.597-06:00Barona, I ask myself the same thing when I see you...Barona, I ask myself the same thing when I see young men dressed in similar attire. There seems to be a gang element to the dress. But it was interesting when I was looking for art for this piece, I had a choice of the old 1950s fashion I chose and the Kardashian sisters. This is a Catholic blog, I simply could not put the Kardashian sisters attire up as an example of female's trying to draw attention to themselves. But I badly wanted to compare their attire with the 1950s one. It was a big change! Thank you for drawing attention to this fact. <br />Dan, Yes, I was thinking the loss of morals in our society coincides with the decline in female fashion. <br />God bless you both. Susan FoxLawrence and Susan Foxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11526624376697144718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066465714745281883.post-12072355195474979562013-12-09T12:12:42.983-06:002013-12-09T12:12:42.983-06:00This comment has been removed by the author.Lawrence and Susan Foxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11526624376697144718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066465714745281883.post-26795785177738683282013-12-09T12:08:34.963-06:002013-12-09T12:08:34.963-06:00Sad thing really, Took a Course in Costume History...Sad thing really, Took a Course in Costume History for the Theater, and odd thing is that Every time there was a Crisis in the Church, it coincided with a Change for the better or the Worse in Womens Clothing due to Wanting to Attract a Man and thoughts on "Fertility" was the biggest influence on it. which also had a Side effect on Architecture structures at the same time. Had to have Wide Steps to get some of those ridiculous 6 Feet wide Dress and have the steps long enough in order to make sure they didn't Trip all over themselves.Daniel Hardynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7066465714745281883.post-52781402824988042362013-12-09T11:06:08.023-06:002013-12-09T11:06:08.023-06:00This is a very thought provoking article. I must c...This is a very thought provoking article. I must confess that I have always had difficulty in believing that women have no idea what they are doing...they must be aware that they are displaying themselves. After all, why all the effort to dress up etc.? <br /><br />Now a related issue as to the cultural change. I've watched a number of old films lately which highlights the sudden change in fashion. A woman from 1935 would be able to pass in 1960 without match of a glance. But consider 1960 to 1966 or 76. Then, consider the late 60s to the early seventies. Suddenly you had an explosion of immodesty, and vulgarity. A different form of degradation is the "ditch digger" attire of so many women. A glance out of my window, and women strolling up the street in casual clothing, would, not a few years ago, be gravely suspect of having a mental illness. Dirty jeans, ragged cloths - all this is trotted out as "normal". Why do women wish to parade in public in cloths fit for digging potatoes?Baronahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06265555388172261643noreply@blogger.com